Re[2]: Fw: answers

From: Matteo Giacomazzi <giacomazzi_at_programmazione_dot_it>
Date: Wed Jul 30 2003 - 12:17:05 CDT

> Hi Alan,
> >>>> Python will be used for the demo. Some modules may be coded with
> >>>> C or C++. The language for the eventual finished product will
> >>>> probably be C or C++, TBD.
> >>
> >> May I ask you why you think that the finished product will be coded
> >> in C/C++?
> >>
> AD> Well, first off I didn't say "will be."
> In fact you said "will probably be", but I hope you got the point of
> my question. ;)
> AD> It is not certain at all. However, the thinking here has to do
> AD> with auditability. Auditability is not important for the demo.
> AD> However, when we deliver the actual voting system software,
> AD> auditability will be a major point. Using a higher level language
> AD> like Python adds an additional layer of auditing issues.
> Well, not sure if I can easily get your point.
> Auditing a program written in a higher lever language like Python
> should be easier than auditing a program written in a high level
> language like C.
> AD> Also, performance is not much of an issue for the demo -- it may
> AD> be more of an issue for the actual voting system.
> Well, as long as the voting machine should not compute some billion of
> floating point operations per second, I guess even a Python program on
> a Linux box equiped with an old Pentium 100 could easily afford what's
> requested! :)
> AD> On the other hand, I notice the FEC guidelines seem to embrace
> AD> "high level languages" for voting system software.
> Hard to say that Python is not an high level language! :)
> AD> So -- bottom line -- I don't really know. C/C++ is just a guess.
> AD> Keep in mind that the demo software is throw away software.
> Sure!
> But I want to point out that writing, testing, maintaing and
> documenting a Python software could be some orders of magnetude easier
> than the corresponding C/C++ software.
> --
> Regards,
> Matteo
Received on Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:17:05 -0700

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 12:50:26 CDT