Re: MSFT Chicanery

From: Greg Christopher <stork_at_electronify_dot_com>
Date: Sat Sep 22 2007 - 16:38:13 CDT

On Sep 22, 2007, at 9:54 AM, wrote:

> I think it even undermines your case.

I am afraid so.

Inside Adobe, we shout pretty loud about the problem (IE specific
sites) because we can- Information Services is supposed to be working
for us.

 From an outside (advocacy) perspective, we have zero control over
who implements the schools system or how we do it, so we are in a
"win over" situation.

> Most people
> naturally respond to an advocacy argument by looking for
> holes. It's an egodefense. The advocacy argument implies
> by its nature that you know something they don't, or they
> were fooled by some deception you saw through.

That's why the message must be delivered gently- so as not to invoke
a fight or flight reaction.

For the record, MS has its own set of accessibility APIs and I'm sure
IE works well in that situation. It's all part of "the plan" :)

I would never code to IE. And activex... my opinion better left unsaid.

p.s. Those who have been shouting loud about the IE sites have gotten
little traction so they best be changing their ways as well.

OVC-discuss mailing list
By sending email to the OVC-discuss list, you thereby agree to release the content of your posts to the Public Domain--with the exception of copyrighted material quoted according to fair use, including publicly archiving at
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
Received on Sun Sep 30 23:17:17 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Sep 30 2007 - 23:17:20 CDT