Re: Is Open Source Enough?

From: Brian Behlendorf <brian_at_behlendorf_dot_com>
Date: Wed Sep 05 2007 - 15:39:17 CDT

On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Arthur Keller wrote:
> At 11:05 PM -0700 9/4/07, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
>> On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Arthur Keller wrote:
>> The primary reason to be in favor of open source voting systems is not
>> technological, but economic. Such software encourages competition, as it
>> lowers the cost of becoming a voting system vendor.
> That's still a theoretical argument. Suppose there are two companies
> competing using the code based by Open Voting Solutions? Would that
> help them compete better against closed source vendors?

Yes. Instead of spending money implementing the same thing twice, they can
spend that money on more hardware in precincts, more staff on site to address
issues, more training for election workers, etc. But possibly even more
significant than saving the cost of implementation is saving the cost of
certification, if the testing fees were instead covered by the state. Even
with subsidized testing, it does mean that one company might invest time and
effort in getting a software system to a certifiable state, only to find their
competitor able to use that certified version at no cost. This is why a
well-run ecosystem won't place the burden of development on just one company,
but spread it out across companies, NGOs, volunteers, and others, ideally
without needing government funding for writing software itself. Defining the
ballots might be all they'd need to do.

This is "theoretical" as any other business strategy is; specific situations
will definitely differ. If we're looking for a way to address the brokenness
of today's model, it's a place to start. But my main point is that it's a
stronger case for open source election software than any claims about security.
I think we'll have a tough enough time convincing laypeople that open source
software is at least as secure as proprietary - some still are confused and
think that if you can view the source code it must by definition be less


OVC-discuss mailing list
By sending email to the OVC-discuss list, you thereby agree to release the content of your posts to the Public Domain--with the exception of copyrighted material quoted according to fair use, including publicly archiving at
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
Received on Sun Sep 30 23:17:05 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Sep 30 2007 - 23:17:20 CDT