Fwd: ITA testing would detect Hursti attack, ballot programming errors, etc.

From: Kathy Dopp <kathy_dot_dopp_at_gmail_dot_com>
Date: Fri Sep 01 2006 - 21:26:30 CDT

Can anyone please help me to verify or refute these claims by Joan
Krawitz (below) of VoteTrustUSA who has been recently telling press
how much she commends the new testing policies of the US EAC, and who
is making claims for the ability of testing to detect things that I
didn't know that it was possible for ITA testing to detect?

Thank you. You might want to cc Joan on your answers, and Warren too.
 Warren is the great writer for VoteTrustUSA who also helped compile
the detailed vote count data from NM.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Joan Krawitz VTUSA <jkrawitz@votetrustusa.org>
Date: Sep 1, 2006 7:56 PM
Subject: Re:
To: kathy@electionarchive.org
Cc: Warren Stewart <warren@votetrustusa.org>

Kathy,

Federal testing if conducted decently can and should find
the kind of problems that have been reported with the Hursti hack, the ES&S
ballot programming and similar system design defects.

Joan

Joan Krawitz
Executive Director
VoteTrustUSA
http://www.votetrustusa.org
Phone: 630-428-1488
_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Sat Sep 30 23:17:01 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Sep 30 2006 - 23:17:08 CDT