Re: Re: Emergency Measures To Protect The 2004 Vote Count (EM2004)

From: Joel Harris <joel_at_ccpconsultinginc_dot_com>
Date: Sat Sep 11 2004 - 08:13:19 CDT

Ellen Theisen wrote:

>Certainly the difference between an electronic,
>unauditable ballot and a physical, auditable ballot could be construed as
>discrimination in access to voting.
If so, then we have never had a non-discriminatory election. I think
that it is a "good thing" that we have a auditable trail, it is by no
means a requirement for an election to be valid and reliable. This
statement is stretching discrimination a long way.

= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
Received on Thu Sep 30 23:17:05 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 30 2004 - 23:17:11 CDT