Re: evmpl license

From: Arthur Keller <arthur_at_kellers_dot_org>
Date: Wed Sep 10 2003 - 13:07:11 CDT

At 1:28 PM -0400 9/10/03, David Mertz wrote:
>|
>|On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 09:31 PM, Clay Lenhart wrote:
>|> <changed>Using the software for voting purposes is considered
>|> "distribution of software" under this agreement. All rights and
>|> restrictions must be obeyed as if the software were actually
>|> distributed.</changed>
>
>I think we should narrow Clay's proposed clause slightly. Specifically,
>"voting purposes" is probably broader than we need. For example, some
>interested people off-list have asked whether our software would be
>usable for a school election, or neighborhood association election (Yes,
>obviously). In those cases, the strict audit requirements don't come
>into play.

Just to be clear, it should apply to a school BOARD election, though.

>We probably get closer to the intended effect by making the clause
>"Using the software for GOVERNMENTAL voting purposes...". But maybe a
>different modifier is better. Of course, if the vendor -distributes-
>the software/hardward to polling places, it at least arguably
>constitutes distribution, even without any clause. But I am on-board
>with making that question quite explicitly answered.

Better to be clear. Distribution usually means distribution *to
others*, and not within an organization.

Arthur

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arthur M. Keller, Ph.D., 3881 Corina Way, Palo Alto, CA  94303-4507
tel +1(650)424-0202, fax +1(650)424-0424
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Tue Sep 30 23:17:02 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 30 2003 - 23:17:09 CDT