Re: [OVC-discuss] IEEE Spectrum, "Open-Source Voting"

From: John-Paul Gignac <jjgignac_at_fossfactory_dot_org>
Date: Fri Oct 03 2008 - 08:40:55 CDT

Just thought I'd chime in...

On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Alan Dechert <dechert@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/oct08/6788
>
> Besides me, they quote Rebecca Mercuri. It's an okay article, but I think I
> should respond to some of the comments by Mercuri.
>
> The problem with the OVC model, says Rebecca
> Mercuri, owner of computer security firm Notable
> Software, in Philadelphia, is that while OVC may
> be more secure than today's proprietary systems,
> it is no more secure than electronically scanning
> paper ballots. ?

By my understanding of OVC's approach, strictly speaking, I think I
would agree with her statement. But it misses the point. Paper
ballots are about as secure as you can get, and I think that OVC is on
par with that. Compared to electronically scanning paper ballots,
OVC's advantages include usability, accessibility and counting
accuracy.

John-Paul
_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
By sending email to the OVC-discuss list, you thereby agree to release the content of your posts to the Public Domain--with the exception of copyrighted material quoted according to fair use, including publicly archiving at http://gnosis.python-hosting.com/voting-project/
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Fri Oct 31 23:17:02 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Oct 31 2008 - 23:17:05 CDT