Re: Question re. Ballot Definition Files

From: David RR Webber \(XML\) <"David>
Date: Mon Oct 23 2006 - 08:41:27 CDT
Dick,
 
I would also point to the Belgium samples of using OASIS EML standards.  I believe that is the other vital part of our OVS approach.  When you have open public voting records - there can be no questions surrounding information points within those records.  Right now with vendor proprietary formats - you really are not sure what you are looking at really.
 
The Belgium system was built by EDS using OASIS EML - and the results are online thru web interface - that really showcases what can be achieved here.   We just need a State to step up and require that this EML interfacing be part of the post-ballot process as Belgium has done...
 
The link is public and online: http://vlaanderenkiest.be/ 
 
You can navigate by selecting the built-in locales and districts - there's even the clickable country map:
 
  http://vlaanderenkiest.be/overzicht.html#tabevent_tab_geoUnitOverview_GE 
 
Enjoy, DW


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [OVC-discuss] Question re. Ballot Definition Files
From: "Richard C. Johnson" <dick@iwwco.com>
Date: Sun, October 22, 2006 11:22 am
To: kathy@electionarchive.org, Open Voting Consortium discussion list
<ovc-discuss@listman.sonic.net>

The method used for to accomplish this by Open Voting Solutions, Inc., a startup voting system vendor, is to imprint each ballot with an ID (NOT serial) number and then to check for valid ballots by matching submitted ballots against the retained list of potential ballots.  Of course, returned invalidated ballots and uncast, blank ballots should match the remaining numbers.
 
For any election using this method, a request for electronic copies of all ballot types generated, the list of printed ballots by ID number by ballot type, and the evidence of matching cast ballots, invalidated ballots and blank ballots should help to solve this problem short of getting copies of the ballots themselves.
 
Open Voting Solutions, one of six companies bidding in New York, is about to withdraw due to disagreements with the state over the conduct of the bidding process.  The expectation is that other states may erect fewer barriers or different barriers to smaller, newer companies.  www.openvotingsolutions.com  provides more information about the 100% open source OpenScan precinct scan system.
 
-- Dick

Kathy Dopp <kathy.dopp@gmail.com> wrote:

Is there any way, given our current shoddy voting equipment, to know a way to request ballot definition files after an election in a way that is verifiably the ballot definitions that were actually used?

Just wondering if there might be a way to do open records requests for ballot definitions after an election and have some sense of receiving the same ballot definitions used during the election.  Since these are not proprietary programs and are not election returns, most state laws should theoretically make them publicly available.

Thanks.

--
----
Kathy Dopp
http://electionarchive.org
National Election Data Archive
Dedicated to Accurately Counting Elections
Subscribe to announcements by emailing election-subscribe@uscountvotes.org
Please donate or volunteer.

"Enlighten the people generally, and tyranny and oppressions of body and mind will vanish like evil spirits at the dawn of day," wrote Thomas Jefferson in 1816 _______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss

_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss

==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Tue Oct 31 23:17:06 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Oct 31 2006 - 23:17:10 CST