Re: Security markings on the ballot

From: Chris Schaefer <evm_at_1reality_dot_org>
Date: Mon Oct 27 2003 - 00:22:03 CST

>
>I guess still open is whether this placement is determined uniquely for
>every cast ballot--as I believe the hash code should be--or if the
>placements are only decided per machine or per polling place. But there
>is no need to decide that level of detail for the demo; that can wait
>for the grant(s) we'll hopefully come up with, and for associated formal
>threat analysis.

Notice that as watermarks get more sophiticated, that they start becoming
a sort of 2-D barcode.....

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Chris Schaefer                                   Email: 
chris<AT>1reality(DOT)org
             Professional Bit Twiddler and student of reality.
                 "Global Information, Local Production"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Fri Oct 31 23:17:05 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Oct 31 2003 - 23:17:07 CST