Re: Security markings on the ballot

From: Chris Schaefer <evm_at_1reality_dot_org>
Date: Sat Oct 25 2003 - 13:44:16 CDT

The cryptographic signature would likely be quite long... as long as or longer
than the vote information itself........

>David,
>
>> What I WOULD like to do, is use a placeholder for the actual
>> cryptographic signature during the demo. ........
>>
>Couldn't the barcode serve this purpose? Right now, we are only using a
>visual obfuscation routine, but couldn't this include your cryptographic
>code(s)?
>
>Alan D.

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Chris Schaefer                                   Email: 
chris<AT>1reality(DOT)org
             Professional Bit Twiddler and student of reality.
                 "Global Information, Local Production"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Fri Oct 31 23:17:04 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Oct 31 2003 - 23:17:07 CST