Re: Security markings on the ballot

From: David Mertz <voting-project_at_gnosis_dot_cx>
Date: Fri Oct 24 2003 - 12:13:09 CDT

Arthur Keller <arthur@kellers.org> wrote:
|What do you think about printing the ballots on special paper
|pre-printed with color ink that says County of XXX Ballot etc.

I agree with Alan's analysis (and Doug's elaboration), and description
of procedures. For the final production system, all kinds of special
stuff may add to voter confidence in feeling that they have something
very official looking. But for the demo, we shouldn't think about
that... and ultimately, from a security perspective, special paper
doesn't amount to much.

Moreover, in my mind, the main threat to ballot integrity is not from
casual voters (say with the extra ballots stuffed in their shirt), but
rather from corrupt poll workers (it's not that hard to get the gig,
after all). So those who are most likely to cause the problems almost
by definition already have access to the special paper.

Yours, David...

--
---[ to our friends at TLAs (spread the word) ]--------------------------
Echelon North Korea Nazi cracking spy smuggle Columbia fissionable Stego
White Water strategic Clinton Delta Force militia TEMPEST Libya Mossad
---[ Postmodern Enterprises <mertz@gnosis.cx> ]--------------------------
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Fri Oct 31 23:17:04 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Oct 31 2003 - 23:17:07 CST