[OVC-demo-team] DRAFT#2 -- PRESS RELEASE

From: Alan Dechert <alan_at_openvotingconsortium_dot_org>
Date: Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:58:26 CST

I took Arnie's and David's suggestions and made a few other edits. I
changed Doug's "it's too easy to play tricks with" to "it's too easy to fool
with" in the spirit of the day. I don't want to over-do it but another
"fool" or two might be okay.

The final version will be on OVC letterhead and include contacts and

GRANITE BAY, CALIFORNIA -- The Open Voting Consortium will demonstrate a
version of its free election software on the 1st of April 10:00 AM at the
Santa Clara County government office building at 70 W. Hedding St., San
Jose. The Open Voting Consortium intends to make free voting software
available for use in public elections to begin a process founders hope will
transform the voting system from a fraud-prone, blackbox, proprietary,
expensive, unreliable system to a technically sound, accurate, secure,
inexpensive, and open voting system.

An international team of volunteer scientists and engineers developed the
demonstration system. Jan Karrman of Sweden, a senior research engineer at
Uppsala University said that the international role of the US "makes it
important outside the U.S. as well that fair elections are being held
there." John-Paul Gignac of Canada wrote the software for the graphical user
interface. Anand Pillai of Bangalore India, Eron Lloyd of Pennsylvania, and
Dr. David Mertz of Massachusetts have been the other main software code
contributors. Fred McLain, a noted computer security expert from
Washington, has served as the lead developer over the past two months. "I'm
proud of what this team has accomplished," said McLain. Laird Popkin of New
York worked on the online version of the ballot printing system.

"Voters should not be fooled into thinking their vote is secure with
paperless electronic voting machines. We need a system like the Open Voting
Consortium is developing that produces a paper ballot that voters can see,
touch, and verify before placing in the ballot box," according to Dr. Arthur
Keller, a computer science professor at UC Santa Cruz and Vice President of
the Open Voting Consortium. Professor Douglas W. Jones, a University of
Iowa computer scientist and often-quoted expert of voting technology,
agrees: "It's too easy to fool with a purely electronic record. We need a
physical token to represent the vote so that it can be checked by ordinary
human beings. We also want a system where all aspects of the system are
open to public inspection so we can be sure everything is above board." Dr.
Jones is also the Chief Technology Officer, and Vice President of the Open
Voting Consortium.

"We are not in favor of having a public process run by private companies
that want to keep everything a secret," says Alan Dechert, President of the
Open Voting Consortium. "It was wise to commit serious funding to modernize
the voting system. But it would be foolish to spend all the money on
immature technology that will be obsolete in a few years. We advocate
spending a small percentage of this money on a comprehensive scientific
research and development project that will give us the best possible voting
system." The Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) earmarks nearly four
billion dollars for voting modernization. Upwards of $1.5 billion has been
appropriated for this fiscal year. "We are working with universities in
several states to get this project launched. Iowa State University and the
University of California are leading the way, with strong teams developing
in Illinois and Nevada, so far."

The Open Voting Consortium is a Nonprofit California Corporation dedicated
to the development, maintenance, and delivery of open voting systems for use
in public elections.

= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
Received on Thu Apr 1 02:40:30 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 02:40:36 CST