Re: Vote for Lizard People in MN?

From: Brent Turner <brent_at_trealestate_dot_net>
Date: Wed Nov 26 2008 - 18:49:40 CST

Or the 50 / 50 is tainted as a set-up and reflects nothing else



[] On
Behalf Of Dylan Hirsch-Shell
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 1:07 PM
To: Open Voting Consortium discussion list
Subject: Re: [OVC-discuss] Vote for Lizard People in MN?


Cameron wrote:

50-50 elections are telling us that the voters
are voting randomly, because they really perceive little difference
among the candidates.

That's one possible (albeit strange) explanation. Or, 50-50 elections are
telling us that the way the candidates have campaigned -- their stated
positions on issues, their apparent trustworthiness/character, their
political party, their negative rhetoric about the other candidate, etc. --
has succeeded in gaining support from almost exactly half of the voters for
each of them.

Your claim that voters are voting randomly in a 50-50 election is rather
bizarre to me. You seem to be confusing and conflating election outcomes
with individual voters' behavior/beliefs.

The Coleman/Franken race is not actually at 50-50. It's 42-42, since 16% of
the voters voted for other candidates (about 15% for the Independence Party
candidate Dean Barkley). Would you then claim that when each MN voter
entered the voting booth he rolled a weighted three-sided die that had a 42%
chance of coming up for Franken or Coleman and a 15% chance for Barkley?

OVC-discuss mailing list
By sending email to the OVC-discuss list, you thereby agree to release the content of your posts to the Public Domain--with the exception of copyrighted material quoted according to fair use, including publicly archiving at

= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
Received on Sun Nov 30 23:17:19 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Nov 30 2008 - 23:17:22 CST