Re: Fwd: Hand count elections

From: Danny Swarzman <danny_at_stowlake_dot_com>
Date: Tue Nov 27 2007 - 17:05:54 CST


That wouldn't be the SF IRV. The requirement is majority of
continuing ballots. That may be a minority of votes cast.


On Nov 27, 2007, at 1:24 PM, Kaj Telenar wrote:

> I have been in favor of IRV for quite a while (20 years or so,
> although
> I called it something else back then). The advantage being that the
> winner has been backed by over half the votes cast, without the added
> expense of running another election (or several additional elections).

OVC-discuss mailing list
By sending email to the OVC-discuss list, you thereby agree to release the content of your posts to the Public Domain--with the exception of copyrighted material quoted according to fair use, including publicly archiving at
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
Received on Fri Nov 30 23:17:28 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 30 2007 - 23:17:32 CST