My issues for DEC 6 workshop on VVSG

From: Alan Dechert <dechert_at_gmail_dot_com>
Date: Sun Nov 25 2007 - 14:46:17 CST

I'm one of several people on this list invited to this workshop (Lillie
Coney and Arthur Keller also).

http://www.itif.org/index.php?id=89

I'm on the advisory board and will be a panelist. My presentation will be
pretty short (about 10 minutes probably) but there will be time for Q&A.
And, I can help shape the event. I expect the panelists and audience will
be pretty receptive, but opposing viewpoints will certainly be expressed.

I'm taking a pretty high-level approach. I welcome your input on this list
of things to talk about. Please write to the list or get in touch with me
off-list if you prefer.

Open Standard
------------------------
- What is an open standard?
- To what extent is the VVSG an open standard?
- Should the VVSG promulgate an open standard?

"Voting System" v. Voting Equipment
----------------------------------------------------
- The VVSG appears to deal with equipment, not whole systems
- Bowen's top-to-bottom review is about equipment; vendors say it's too
narrowly about equipment
- Assuming the VVSG is really about equipment, to what extent must it
consider the voting system
- Auditability is part of the system and cannot be completely separate from
the equipment

Open Technology
--------------------------
- How is "open technology" different from "open standard"
- Almost all the independent experts want the technology to be open
- Would voting system quality, trustworthiness, and security be enhanced by
open technology?
- Why does industry promote the notion of security by obscurity?
- To what extent does the VVSG endorse the industry view?

Ballot
-----------------
- "Counting ballots" and "recounting ballots" are basic concepts that must
be comprehensible to the public
- What definition of "ballot" is used by the VVSG?

Proliferation of Systems
---------------------------------------
- To what extent is proliferation a problem?
- Is the VVSG neutral on system proliferation?
- Should the VVSG be neutral on this subject?

Quality & Trustworthiness
-----------------------------------------
- Is this a major goal of the VVSG?
- To be trustworthy, quality must be evident to voting public
- Can openness help foster trustworthiness?

Relevancy
-------------------------
- Ideally, everything in the VVSG would be relevant to all jurisdictions
- How much of the VVSG is relevant to any particular jurisdiction?
- Is there a way to measure relevancy?
- How is proliferation related to relevancy?

Alan D.

_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
By sending email to the OVC-discuss list, you thereby agree to release the content of your posts to the Public Domain--with the exception of copyrighted material quoted according to fair use, including publicly archiving at http://gnosis.python-hosting.com/voting-project/
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Fri Nov 30 23:17:26 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 30 2007 - 23:17:31 CST