Re: Peer Hand Counting

From: Bev Harris <bev_at_blackboxvoting_dot_org>
Date: Wed Nov 14 2007 - 09:58:38 CST

> Precinct scan reduces the problems with chain-of-custody issue. Best
> to scan precinct-cast votes in the precinct and the mail-in ballots
> centrally.

In New Hampshire, mail-in ballots are delivered by the Post Office to the poll
sites on election day and they are counted at the polls along with the other
ballots. This reduces centralization of control over ballots, improves chain of
custody protections against inside tampering (still some issues with post
office handling). It gets the ballots counted ON election day, not before,
enabling cheat-peeks as Jim March and crew have discovered in Arizona, and not
after, creating a playground for insiders, as we saw in King County Washington
in 2004. While mail-in ballots still defeat the concept of exit polls, at least
scanning them at the precinct helps preserve some of the demographics.

Bev

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
By sending email to the OVC-discuss list, you thereby agree to release the content of your posts to the Public Domain--with the exception of copyrighted material quoted according to fair use, including publicly archiving at http://gnosis.python-hosting.com/voting-project/
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Fri Nov 30 23:17:23 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 30 2007 - 23:17:31 CST