Re: Taskforce on Federal Legislation

From: Arthur Keller <voting_at_kellers_dot_org>
Date: Fri Nov 17 2006 - 12:33:05 CST

I would be happy to host such a list at Sonic.net, including an
automatically generated publicly available archive that can be
searched by Google. Ginny can be the person who approves people who
request to subscribe, as well as maintains the list. The OVC-discuss
list in maintained at Sonic.net that way, although it has an external
archive.

Plus, there's no advertising! And turnaround is much faster.

Best regards,
Arthur

At 9:10 AM -0800 11/17/06, Ginny Ross wrote:
>Thank you for this idea, Dick. I agree. Do you have a software
>based solution? Can you recommend a forum software perhaps? Trying
>to learn all this is, itself, like the proverbial firehose drink!
>:-)
>
>Ginny
>
>Richard C. Johnson wrote:
>
>>I appreciate Ginny's call for a more central source of information
>>for those interested in election issues. I believe two steps are
>>needed: (1) a central email discussion list and (2) a means of
>>searching/filtering that list. Most personal and business email
>>allows search of subject and address if not also content. A
>>central list will accumulate a vast amount of information and,
>>without search capability and filters, we will be trying to drink
>>from the firehose. IMHO.
>>
>>-- Dick
>>
>>Ginny Ross <mailto:Ginnypdx@comcast.net><Ginnypdx@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>Dear EI Leaders,
>>
>>A new and increasingly urgent concern for all of us is federal EI
>>legislation and the pros and cons of HR 550 and HB 6200.
>>
>>I feel caught up in a whirlwind of discussion on legislation in
>>the various EI leaders lists I participate in. There are likely
>>many others feeling the same.
>>
>>I believe it is vital for our movement to unify under common
>>principles. Our main differences could likely be understood and
>>perhaps resolved with concentrated, open, collaborative efforts.
>>Then we could push together, as a movement, for passage of urgently
>>needed paper ballot legislation that will not be burdened with a
>>battle royale or intra-movement conflict over the other features of
>>HR 550.
>>
>>I do not know the answers, but I know that we are racing the clock
>>in an all out sprint to save democracy from these DRE's before '08.
>>
>>Therefore, I would like to propose a unified discussion/action list
>>that will allow all voices to be heard in a fair and open forum.
>>As a simple starting point, I feel the main discussions fall into 4
>>general areas:
>>
>>1) Paper Ballot / Record requirements
>>2) Audit/Verification of machine votes and counts
>>3) Oversight & Transparency issues / Vendor Involvement in Certification
>>4) Strategy as to how to approach the new Congress (Amend HR 550 /
>>HB 6200, other approaches)
>>
>>Maybe there is another way to outline the tasks, or I have omitted
>>something important. My goal is to stay very simple.
>>
>>I propose the formation of a single Yahoo group on this vital
>>topic, inviting all serious activists concerned with federal EI
>>legislative issues and all who wish to listen. I volunteer to
>>create the list and help moderate to prevent any disruption in this
>>vital work. The information discussed could be freely shared, and
>>therefore allow participants to use the information to inform their
>>own legislators. I believe in free, viral transmission of
>>information in the situation (such as now) when we are in a very
>>dangerous, high speed, fast track approach to HR 550. I do not
>>feel alone in expressing near panic that the bill might be passed
>>without the major (not too time consuming) overhaul it needs.
>>
>>The core lists I would build the
>><mailto:EILeg@yahoogroups.com>"EILeg@yahoogroups.com" list would
>>draw from VTUSA, ElectionIntegrity, BBV, CEPN, EDA, USVotecounts,
>>OregonVRC, CASE_OH, PDA and OVC. I may be missing something
>>important, I don't know. This is not an exclusive list, just a
>>practical starting point. I feel that on all these lists, there is
>>a GOLDMINE of legislative discussion and strategy. I believe in
>>consolidating, collaborating, and treating this goldmine as our
>>treasury of future power. We need to capture and use this power
>>effectively if we, as a movement, hope to have a compelling, rapid
>>and undeniable influence upon the federal legislative efforts that
>>are now on the immediate horizon.
>>
>>Your comments and ideas on this topic, or offers to assist or to
>>manage the project, are welcome.
>>
>>Sincerely,
>>Ginny Ross
>>Portland, OR
>>_______________________________________________
>>OVC-discuss mailing list
>><mailto:OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net>OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
>><http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss>http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>OVC-discuss mailing list
>><mailto:OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net>OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
>><http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss>http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
>>
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>OVC-discuss mailing list
>OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
>http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arthur M. Keller, Ph.D., 3881 Corina Way, Palo Alto, CA  94303-4507
tel +1(650)424-0202, fax +1(650)424-0424

_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss

==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Thu Nov 30 23:17:08 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Nov 30 2006 - 23:17:19 CST