Re: Fwd: Question re. audits in Wisconsin

From: Charlie Strauss <cems_at_earthlink_dot_net>
Date: Mon Nov 06 2006 - 12:09:27 CST

Perhaps this is not a detail to sweat this time around? just be happy.

On Nov 5, 2006, at 9:50 PM, Kathy Dopp wrote:

> I have this same question for Utah - although they may select a
> different random number generator program.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Paul Malischke <malischke@yahoo.com>
> Date: Nov 5, 2006 9:14 PM
> Subject: audits in Wisconsin
> To: kathy@electionarchive.org
>
> Hello,
> The Wisconsin State Elections Board completed the procedure for
> audits of vote counts over the weekend. They plan to use Excel's
> random number generator for selecting which areas are audited. I
> am not familiar with this. Does it meet our goal of a transparent
> method of selection?
>
> The procedures are at http://www.fairelectionswi.com/audits/audits.htm
> Thanks for your help,
> Paul Malischke
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OVC-discuss mailing list
> OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
> http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss

_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss

==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Thu Nov 30 23:17:05 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Nov 30 2006 - 23:17:19 CST