Re: Development model

From: Fred McLain <mclain_at_zipcon_dot_net>
Date: Wed Nov 10 2004 - 19:35:53 CST

I agree with you about SF. Much of their functionality isn't in use
now. We've had folks posting over there recently thinking that all
discussion about OVC was stale - only because they didn't know we use a
different list system.

I've had a CVS system up and running for quite some time at
fredmclain.com but I don't have scheduled backups or the spiffy
administrative interfaces that SF has. FYI, last time I looked you
could buy the SF software for unlimited use for only about $10k.

Gosh, sounds like we should all move back to the dev list, eh?

        -Fred-

On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 08:41, laird popkin wrote:
> Personally, I think that SourceForge is a great deal -- lots of
> functionality pre-built, for free, but their quality of service can be
> iffy. But even if we're a little frustrated with them, I'd recommend
> against us setting up our own source code repository, bug reporting
> database, etc., until we've got more people (and funding) in place to
> support them properly.
>
>
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 11:02:16 -0500, David Mertz
> <voting-project@gnosis.cx> wrote:
> > On Nov 10, 2004, at 1:38 AM, Fred McLain wrote:
> > > Certainly. If we have a better way to do a developer source repository
> > > we need to do it, Source Forge has been a huge hindrance with it's
> > > outages and slow response times.
> >
> > I'm certainly not committed to Sourceforge per se. I agree it's been
> > frustrating at times, a different host might be better (possibly one
> > OVC itself maintains, or maybe a different public one).
> >
> > > I'm not sure that is the question here. I don't think anyone has said
> > > that volunteers are not welcome. The question I see is would a
> > > successful OVC will have development staff? I believe that the answer
> > > should, and will be yes.
> >
> > I got the impression Anand was worried about the possibility of
> > volunteers being uninvited when we get paid developers. We're all in
> > agreement that that should not happen.
> >
> >
>
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Tue Nov 30 23:17:26 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 30 2004 - 23:17:44 CST