Re: Development model

From: David Mertz <voting-project_at_gnosis_dot_cx>
Date: Wed Nov 10 2004 - 10:02:16 CST

On Nov 10, 2004, at 1:38 AM, Fred McLain wrote:
> Certainly. If we have a better way to do a developer source repository
> we need to do it, Source Forge has been a huge hindrance with it's
> outages and slow response times.

I'm certainly not committed to Sourceforge per se. I agree it's been
frustrating at times, a different host might be better (possibly one
OVC itself maintains, or maybe a different public one).

> I'm not sure that is the question here. I don't think anyone has said
> that volunteers are not welcome. The question I see is would a
> successful OVC will have development staff? I believe that the answer
> should, and will be yes.

I got the impression Anand was worried about the possibility of
volunteers being uninvited when we get paid developers. We're all in
agreement that that should not happen.
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Tue Nov 30 23:17:23 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 30 2004 - 23:17:44 CST