Re: Better than one subscription per 200 visitors

From: Fred McLain <mclain_at_zipcon_dot_net>
Date: Sun Nov 07 2004 - 15:10:24 CST

Here's an example of the type of blog entry I was referring to:

http://fredmclain.com/?q=node/view/98

Note that this is a blog and as such represents only my opinions, and
does not in any way officially represent OVC. Errors or inaccuracies
are my own.

        -Fred-

On Sun, 2004-11-07 at 12:34, Fred McLain wrote:
> As I mentioned earlier, our page rank is definitely improving.
>
> If any of us has a blog, post a link in it to our site. Google will
> pick up on search phrases contained within a link. For example:
>
> Make your vote count!
>
> or
>
> prevent voting fraud
>
> or
>
> voter verified ballot
>
> I'll add a link in my blog (http://fredmclain.com) later today. FYI, it
> usually takes several days before google discovers these links.
>
> -Fred-
>
> On Sun, 2004-11-07 at 12:22, Alan Dechert wrote:
> > If you go to this page and log in with user and pswd = ovc
> > http://www.cwfarchives.com/pphlogger/
> > you can see that we have a little over 12,000 visitors since OVC 28.
> >
> > Traffic dramatically increased around NOV 1 -- something like 11,000 of the
> > visitors are since NOV1. In the period since NOV 1, we have more than 60
> > new subscriptions. So, without getting too precise about the numbers,
> > that's better than one new paying membership per 200 visitors. I think this
> > is remarkably good. 200,000 visitors will bring us 1,000 new members.
> >
> > Please keep trying to find ways to get our URL in front of people on the
> > Internet!
> >
> > Alan D.
> >
> >
>
>
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Tue Nov 30 23:17:15 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 30 2004 - 23:17:44 CST