Re: 400 visitors per hour and software progress

From: Edmund R. Kennedy <ekennedyx_at_yahoo_dot_com>
Date: Mon Nov 01 2004 - 16:30:38 CST

Hello Alan, Arthur and David:
 
About the wiki suggestions: The earliest I can reasonably respond to your information is Nov. 3. In general I would think that y'all could do a better job of presenting your accomplishment to the wiki than I could 3rd hand. There is now a direct link to the wiki at the OVC links page. As I just did in the donations and publicity topic, you could just basically paste chunks of your letters into the wiki and then edit them to suit you.
 
Thanks, Ed Kennedy

Arthur Keller <arthur@kellers.org> wrote:
At 4:41 PM -0500 11/1/04, David Mertz wrote:
>Alan:
>|There isn't a lot of news regarding software development right now, but
>|maybe David, Fred, Liam, or others have something to report.
>
>"Edmund R. Kennedy" wrote:
>|I thought so much of my own copy that I set up an account and submitted
>|it to the pre-election discussion now under way. HTH.
>
>Not really software development. But one little snippet, Ed, that you
>might put in the Wiki and/or in a slashdot submission is that OVC is
>actively involved in IEEE P-1622 "Voting Systems Electronic Data
>Interchange." Blah, blah, blah: Along with developing a reference Free
>Software voting system, OVC is working with commercial vendors and the
>IEEE to develop open public standards for the exchange of information
>related to voters, voting, and ballots.
>
>Specifically, I'm the "OVC representative" there. Arthur is also an
>individual member. And Kurt Hyde has attended two working group
>teleconferences (and will be eligible for membership as of the next
>official meeting, according to the committee rules).

Also I'm an active individual participant in the IEEE P-1583
standards committee, and I've done a lot in the last month or so to
promote what I'm calling Computerized Ballot Markers (CBMs) and
Computerized Ballot Printers (CBPs) as separate and distinct concepts
from DRE's. I've worked with them to reorganize the draft standard
along functional lines. In fact, it was Dr. Mercuri who took the lead
in proposing that it be done based in part on my comments. The Voter
Verified Paper Audit Trail section will soon talk about CBMs and CBPs
in addition to DREs with AVVPATs, and I'm working on a draft of those
changes.

>I'll write about this at:
>
> http://gnosis.cx/voting/
>
>From time-to-time. I have a couple articles that touch on it already
>there.
>
>It's a small thing. Joe Hall's work on voting machine databases is
>probably more important. Or David Jefferson's significant role on the
>California voting commission (what's the exact name?). But IEEE
>standards might appeal to techies.
>
>Yours, David...

Best regards,
Arthur

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arthur M. Keller, Ph.D., 3881 Corina Way, Palo Alto, CA 94303-4507
tel +1(650)424-0202, fax +1(650)424-0424
-- 
10777 Bendigo Cove
San Diego, CA 92126-2510
As you think, so you become.
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Tue Nov 30 23:17:03 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 30 2004 - 23:17:43 CST