Re: securing electronic ballots

From: Arthur Keller <arthur_at_kellers_dot_org>
Date: Mon Nov 24 2003 - 11:55:39 CST

At 11:55 AM -0500 11/24/03, David Mertz wrote:
>Just to clarify, the NSF proposal (on which I am just an "outside
>consultant", by no means a co-PI) does not advance my particular
>protocol, described at:
>Rather, the proposal just had some generic language like "analyze the
>threat model"... I think written by Doug Jones (but apologies to a
>different proposal author if one of the others wrote the paragraph).

David, I don't know if you were told, but the NSF returned our
proposal unopened because they were reorganizing and weren't prepared
to review our propsal. We'll have another opportunity to submit a
proposal and can revise it further.

Best regards,

Arthur M. Keller, Ph.D., 3881 Corina Way, Palo Alto, CA  94303-4507
tel +1(650)424-0202, fax +1(650)424-0424
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
Received on Sun Nov 30 23:17:07 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Nov 30 2003 - 23:17:13 CST