Re: Re: securing electronic ballots

From: Clay Lenhart <clay_at_lenharts_dot_net>
Date: Mon Nov 24 2003 - 11:29:33 CST

>
> We welcome vigorous debate, and we are honored to receive input from such an
> expert on cryptography like you. But we could also use some help with
> immediate tasks.
>

Alan, I only care about one thing: securing the electronic ballots. More specifically, I think the goal should be: electronically detecting tampering of the ballots. We need electronic safeguards to know that the ballots are 100% correct. When there is something funny with the electronic ballots, the paper trail should be the final authority for an election.

Back to the original point, some of us will only work on one section of the software.

-Clay
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Sun Nov 30 23:17:07 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Nov 30 2003 - 23:17:13 CST