Re: [OVC-discuss] Can we talk details about adding Humboldt-style scanning to the OVC project?

From: Jim March <1_dot_jim_dot_march_at_gmail_dot_com>
Date: Mon May 25 2009 - 12:30:48 CDT

Arthur, what's your thoughts on precinct-scanning (graphical scans
that is) versus taking precinct ballots back to be centrally counted?

There's obviously merit both ways. Chain of custody is better
protected doing it at the precinct, at a moderate (sub-$300) hardware
cost and (arguably) a bit more pollworker complexity.

Doing it centrally, we can get ID stamps put on them as they're scanned.

Jim
_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
By sending email to the OVC-discuss list, you thereby agree to release the content of your posts to the Public Domain--with the exception of copyrighted material quoted according to fair use, including publicly archiving at http://gnosis.python-hosting.com/voting-project/
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Sun May 31 23:17:04 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun May 31 2009 - 23:17:07 CDT