Re: Voting with digital pen

From: Charlie Strauss <cems_at_earthlink_dot_net>
Date: Tue May 22 2007 - 22:24:20 CDT

Ron I think you may have missed my point.
I don't propose to use it like they imagine its use. I propose to use
it the OVC way (see outline in previous e-mail). Then it's not more
or less risky than the OVC touch screen component. Actually I think
it's less risky, because I suspect voters are probably better voters
and better checkers of hand marked ballots than printed or worse,
screen ballot choices.

To make one specific point: In the OVC paradigm the pen will NOT be
recording the votes. It does keep a memory of all marked ballots.
But it does not tally them since some of those marked get discarded.
It does however corroborate the creation of all final paper ballots
that are hand scanned later.

On May 21, 2007, at 6:36 PM, Ronald Crane wrote:

> Jan Karrman wrote:
>> ..in Germany:
>>
>> http://fee.iavoss.org/2006/papers/fee-2006-iavoss-New-Generation-
>> of-Voting-Machines-in-Germany.pdf
>>
> The pen is a compact scanner. The paper "ballots" do help avert
> presentation and procedural attacks, but the paper does not discuss
> audits, and apparently does not envision that the "ballots" will be
> used
> after marking, except when the selections are ambiguous. On security,
> the paper says, "The countermeasures are summarized as security
> objectives, e. g. every voter can check whether the pen is manipulated
> and whether his ballot is counted [8]." Note 8 then says, "Remark:
> Here
> it is enough that the computer displays that the vote was successfully
> stored in the electronic ballot box (of course without any information
> about the content)." "Enough" for what purpose? Note 7 says, "Note
> that
> the digital electoral pen system is equipped with a security feature
> that comes for free: It is impossible to manipulate, e. g.
> invalidate a
> ballot during validation." The "e.g." is perhaps true, but the general
> principle is not: an attacker can program the pen to record selections
> incorrectly, and is likely to get away with it because there are no
> audits.
>
> -R
> _______________________________________________
> OVC-discuss mailing list
> OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
> http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss

_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Thu May 31 23:17:04 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu May 31 2007 - 23:17:05 CDT