Re: flimsy paper?

From: Cameron L. Spitzer <cls_at_truffula_dot_sj_dot_ca_dot_us>
Date: Wed May 11 2005 - 15:07:35 CDT

>Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 16:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
>From: "Edmund R. Kennedy" <ekennedyx@yahoo.com>
>Subject: Re: [OVC-discuss] flimsy paper?

>Sounds like 'thermal' paper Kurt like they used to use on fax machines.
>I remember we were always cautioned to xerox our thermal paper faxes.
>It also sounded silly to me until one day I left a thermal printed
>fax on a south facing window still in mid-morning and came back after
>lunch to find that it had turned completely brown. I wonder if Lara's
>questioner is thinking about thermal paper? That certainly is flimsy.
>I wouldn't put it past the DRE vendors to think that a thermal receipt
>paper would be fine for ballots under glass.

Carbonless carbon paper ("NCR paper") has the same problem.
Rough handling or a little heat and the image is lost.
Extra marks can be made with a second original and the tampering
is really hard to detect. Thumbs down for NCR paper.

Cameron

_______________________________________________
OVC discuss mailing lists
Send requests to subscribe or unsubscribe to arthur@openvotingconsortium.org
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Tue May 31 23:17:34 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 31 2005 - 23:17:52 CDT