Re: Open Source licensing, Take 2

From: Edward Cherlin <cherlin_at_pacbell_dot_net>
Date: Tue May 10 2005 - 15:42:10 CDT

On Tuesday 10 May 2005 11:58, Alan Dechert wrote:
> Ed,
>
> > It is preferable to use an existing license, which has been
> > hammered on by lawyers and geeks, for the same reason that
> > Open Source software is to be preferred.
>
> We have lots of lawyers and geeks to hammer on any language we
> come up with. I don't see a constraint there.

For a very small value of "lots".

-- 
Edward Cherlin
Generalist & activist--Linux, languages, literacy and more
"A knot! Oh, do let me help to undo it!"
--Alice in Wonderland
http://cherlin.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
OVC discuss mailing lists
Send requests to subscribe or unsubscribe to arthur@openvotingconsortium.org
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Tue May 31 23:17:32 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 31 2005 - 23:17:52 CDT