Re: Shamos Rebuttal, Draft 3

From: Ron Crane <voting_at_lastland_dot_net>
Date: Mon May 09 2005 - 10:04:05 CDT

Is there a bug in your mail system, or have you purposely posted this
identical message 4 times? First it was 5/8 at 11:54, then twice at
17:20, and now again at 22:04.

-R

On May 8, 2005, at 11:04 PM, Kathy Dopp wrote:

> Ron Crane wrote:
>
>>
>> I disagree with some other edits.
>>
>> I am deleting the last item in 5. It's a minor point, and I refuse
>> to cite any improperly-conducted poll (such as the ACM's poll on
>> paper trails) in any formal paper.
>>
>> The qualifications you added to the conclusion weaken it
>> substantially, and introduce terms not elsewhere defined ("auditable
>> dual data paths", "Best Practices").
>>
>> Finally, I am a little confused by your edit in 3.3.
>
>
> IMO, when you do not accept the edits that people make - then not many
> people will be willing to co-sign or make use of your document.
>
> You should try as much as possible to bend over backwards to accept at
> least partially, or figure out how to incorporate, all the points that
> you are given....

_______________________________________________
OVC discuss mailing lists
Send requests to subscribe or unsubscribe to arthur@openvotingconsortium.org
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Tue May 31 23:17:26 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 31 2005 - 23:17:52 CDT