Re: Brand new concept in audit trails

From: Kathy Dopp <kathy_at_uscountvotes_dot_org>
Date: Wed May 04 2005 - 16:36:57 CDT

Jim March wrote:

>
> No, Ron, it does NOT "kill the carbon copy scheme" or it's variants
> because the only thing the duplicate paper is doing is ensuring the
> accuracy and hackproofing of a data type ALREADY declared public
> record in all 50 states.

I am not for or against the carbon copy scheme. However, I think it is a
very far cry from today's voting systems.

Offer both systems - OVC with or OVC without carbon copies. i.e. It is
appropriate for the election offices who purchase systems to decide this
one IMO.

GOOD NEWS: The Provo Herald printed my Op Ed piece today:

http://www.heraldextra.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=54233&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0

Best,

Kathy
_______________________________________________
OVC discuss mailing lists
Send requests to subscribe or unsubscribe to arthur@openvotingconsortium.org
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Tue May 31 23:17:18 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 31 2005 - 23:17:52 CDT