Re: Brand new concept in audit trails

From: Ron Crane <voting_at_lastland_dot_net>
Date: Wed May 04 2005 - 16:10:28 CDT

On May 4, 2005, at 1:22 PM, Cameron L. Spitzer wrote:

>> I'd like to hear from privacy experts about the merits or demerits of
>> publishing individual votes (identified only by precinct and ballot
>> type, and perhaps by voting machine). I know that this is an issue
>> that Kelly raised on Sunday's OVC tech (not tek, please) meeting.
> It's already an issue for members of the smaller parties. Often there
> is only one Peace & Freedom or Green Party voter in a precinct.
> Party affiliation is public record. If primary results are published
> by precinct, you could tell how the person voted because it's the
> only ballot of that type cast at that precinct. In a general election,
> you could make an educated guess and be right most of the time.

That's a big problem. It's one thing to reduce voting privacy for
everyone, and something else to reduce privacy such that it effects
certain parties or candidates more than others. I think this kills the
carbon-copy scheme, though it still allows for the publication of
precinct totals. The latter is very important, since it permits public
verification of the global tally.


OVC discuss mailing lists
Send requests to subscribe or unsubscribe to
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
Received on Tue May 31 23:17:18 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 31 2005 - 23:17:52 CDT