Re: website licensing

From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <jhall_at_sims_dot_berkeley_dot_edu>
Date: Wed May 26 2004 - 19:37:45 CDT

> I'd recommend instead
> for both. But any CC license you put on the website content is
> fine, really.

I'd recommend the same... there's no real reason (I believe) to
restrict use further by stipulating no derivative works or commercial
use. However, as was suggested a while back, if the email archives
are indeed public domain, you might want to include a link to

in the appropriate area.

I've got an email about the larger licensing issues in the works that
I hope to send out tomorrow... I'd like to start a thread that reaches
some closure on what the software (and any non-COTS hardware) will be
licensed under (Arthur, please fill me in at that point on what has
already been decided).

= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
Received on Mon May 31 23:18:08 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 31 2004 - 23:18:17 CDT