Re: Consensus of the OVC

From: Alan Dechert <alan_at_openvotingconsortium_dot_org>
Date: Tue May 25 2004 - 12:35:36 CDT

FEC guidelines recommend minimizing page turns. This was the motivation for
the full-faced ballot and large screen. This is another study question.
Full-faced v. paginated ballots.

We may want to get a system certified that can use a smaller screen.
However, we can't say which is really better until this factor has been
throughly studied.

As with many other things, trials are needed.

Alan D.

> I notice that the Wiki says that the design monitor size shall be 17"
> measured diagonally. Do we really need a 17" monitor? I personally
> think that the approach of showing all or many contests on one screen
> is confusing. I personally prefer the approach I've seen used on
> DRE's that involve placing only one contest at a time (and preferably
> all candidates of that contest) on the screen. I think having one
> contest at a time on the screen is less error prone than showing all
> contests at one. Isn't that the lesson of the so-called Butterfly
> Ballot, don't make multi-column ballots?
>
> Best regards,
> Arthur
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
> Arthur M. Keller, Ph.D., 3881 Corina Way, Palo Alto, CA 94303-4507
> tel +1(650)424-0202, fax +1(650)424-0424
>
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Mon May 31 23:18:04 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 31 2004 - 23:18:17 CDT