Re: Printers Revisited

From: Edmund R. Kennedy <ekennedyx_at_yahoo_dot_com>
Date: Mon May 24 2004 - 15:30:06 CDT

Hello Karl:
 
     I don't disagree with your discussions about power hazards. Does anyone know what has been experience with power issues with other systems? I'm glad UPS's are safer than they used to be. The idea about preprinted ballots isn't mine but was one of the five options that was discussed about 2 weeks ago in the polling placed initialization discussion especially in regards to primaries. As the issue was left open for future development I didn't want to preclude this option.
 
Thanks, Ed Kennedy
 
====================================

Karl Auerbach <karl@cavebear.com> wrote:

On Mon, 24 May 2004, Edmund R. Kennedy wrote:

> ... I thought the batteries on UPS used a gel electrolyte and not a
> liquid.

Yes, they are generally sealed gel batteries. So they are safe most of
the time. It just that when they do get into a fire situation, then they
get bad. UPS fires are probably more rare today then they were five years
ago when the mongo refrigerator APCs we use at trade shows burned.

And yes, there are protective circuits. But a laser printer during warm
up or printing can draw a lot of power. This means more often than
burning that the UPS simply throws its own breaker. Which shuts down the
printer and the voting station.

Because the laser printers draw these big loads only intermittently it is
likely that there will be few problems with overloaded circuit breakers
until there are a lot of voters voting at the same time. Then it is
likely that there will be times when all the printers are drawing at the
same time. And if its a hot afternoon or evening then the poll workers
may have fans running on those same circuits. And if it is a cold morning
or evening, then there will often be space heaters. The situations are
ripe for circuit overloading.

> As I've previously mentioned, I've been looking at ink jet printers for
> other purposes and I haven't yet seen one that doesn't present the
> output face up. Also, if we're using partially preprinted ballots as
> some have discussed, that requires the voter to put the ballot in 'up
> side or face down' which would be even more confusing.

Are we really sure we want voters putting paper into printers? That seems
a recepie for paper jams due to everything from folded paper to chocolate
on the paper from the fingers of a voter eating a candy bar.

If the voter does put pre-printed paper into the printer that
pre-printing, if it is the security background stuff, can be printed on
both sides and have vertical symmetry so that no matter how the paper is
inserted it is valid.

--karl--

10777 Bendigo Cove
San Diego, CA 92126-2510

Amendment 1 to the US Constitution

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for the redress of grievances."
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Mon May 31 23:18:02 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 31 2004 - 23:18:17 CDT