Re: Schedule for the EVM Mark 1

From: Alan Dechert <alan_at_openvotingconsortium_dot_org>
Date: Tue May 18 2004 - 10:00:26 CDT

> On May 18, 2004, at 1:40 AM, Arthur Keller wrote:
> >
> > OK, how long should we leave for software certification? And how much
> > of the system needs to be certified? Thanks.
>
> Well, ES&S promised the new version of their software last summer. It's
> still not through certification a year later. How much of this is their
> delay in getting it to the labs and how much is the labs delay I don't
> know,
> but delays of 6 months to 1.5 years are common.
>

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1583474,00.asp?rsDis=E_Voting_Oversight_Overwhelms_U.S._Agency-Page001-125891

> Shawn Southworth, who directs Ciber's voting
> software testing practice, said more labs would
> only add more confusion.
>
> "You'd have a lot of different companies interpreting
> standards their own ways," he said. "It takes years
> to understand the election process and how the
> software is supposed to function."
>
Southworth is one of the guys I spoke with 3 years ago (then PSI Net). This
is an intolerable situation. We have no choice but to get involved in this.
How much of this is Doug Lewis?

Alan D

==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Mon May 31 23:17:53 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 31 2004 - 23:18:16 CDT