Re: Have you ever been a poll worker?

From: Arthur Keller <arthur_at_kellers_dot_org>
Date: Mon May 17 2004 - 13:11:47 CDT

At 9:44 AM -0700 5/17/04, Edmund R. Kennedy wrote:
>Hello Arthur:
>
> That's a great idea! To expand on it, how about a, "Please
>place your ballot here [under a simple scanner] to start the voting
>process," routine? Perhaps the hand held scanner could be placed in
>some sort of plastic or cardboard jig to ease placement?
>I'd imagine something like a picture or an outline of the otherwise
>blank ballot showing a generic bar code with the actual scanner head
>in the right location. A normally sighted voter would slide the
>ballot into the position shown in outline and the reading of the bar
>code would initializes the voting cycle. That way the scanner would
>not have to be attached to the printer. There is the problem of RII
>folks but perhaps the notched ballot concept would work here as well
>say with some braile dots. Yes, there is the drawback of another
>gadget in the voting station and it could be sensitive to lighting
>conditon! s. Are you thinking of placing the bar code along the
>short side?

No, the pre-printed bar code goes along the long side next to the
other bar code, so they both could be scanned at once by the BVA or
BRP. Marianna suggested that instructions of what to do go on the
ballot itself, so that voters can more likely to it themselves.
Legends with graphical instructions should go on the devices
themselves. "Place your ballot in the plastic jig face down with the
cut corner on the right nearest you," or some similar instructions.

If the ballot will be face down (so that it is printed face down in
the output, and does not have to be turned), then a flat bed scanner
underneath the paper in the sheet feeder of the printer (perhaps as
the "tray" of the sheet feeder).

Best regards,
Arthur
>
>
>Thanks, Ed Kennedy
>
>Arthur Keller <arthur@kellers.org> wrote:
>
>Thanks, Steve, for your very reasoned response to David's taxonomy.
>
>At 10:18 PM -0700 5/16/04, Steve Chessin wrote:
>>Also, voters will have to enter the correct party. Some may be tempted
>>to enter the wrong party, and will be frustrated when the poll-worker
>>rejects their ballot. There will definitely be confusion for the voter
>>when among the chocies they see, say, "Democratic" (for registered
>>Democrats), "Republican" (for registered Republicans), "NP-Democratic"
>>(for Decline To State who want to vote in the Democratic primary), and
>>"NP-Republican" (for Decline to State who want to vote in the
>>Republican primary). They will have to be told what to enter when they
>>are handed their color-coded blank ballot. (It would help if the
>>color-coded blank ballot were also pre-printed with the party name, or
>&g! t;NP for no party.)
>
>If the preprinted ballot had a small bar code on it (in a different
>place obviously than the voter's contest selection ballot bar code)
>that identified the type of ballot, then a check could be made that
>the two bar codes were compatible in the BVA and the BRP.
>
>You might also be able to rig up a scanner underneath the sheet
>feeder for the printer that (1) made sure the paper ballot stock was
>oriented correctly (could be done with an electric eye, for example)
>and (2) automatically read the preprinted ballot bar code and that
>"instructed" the EVM which ballot type to select for the voter.
>
>These two steps would considerably reduce errors and the potential
>for fraud. Plus, it would reduce the amount of work involved by poll
>workers. It would reduce the "San Diego" multiple precinct error
>problem as well. It doesn't have a secretary of code problem. It
>doesn't have the queuing problem. It requires minim! al training of
>poll workers, and has minimal extra effort by poll workers.
>Furthermore, it reduces the "black box" quality of smart cards. The
>main downside, is that my mods to Ellen's idea requires printer
>customization.
>
>Best regards,
>Arthur
>
>--
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Arthur M. Keller, Ph.D., 3881 Corina Way, Palo Alto, CA 94303-4507
>tel +1(650)424-0202, fax +1(650)424-0424
>
>
>
>10777 Bendigo Cove
>San Diego, CA 92126-2510
>
>Amendment 1 to the US Constitution
>
>"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
>or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom
>of speech, or of the press; or the right of people peaceably to
>assemble, and to petition the government for the redress of
>grievances."

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arthur M. Keller, Ph.D., 3881 Corina Way, Palo Alto, CA  94303-4507
tel +1(650)424-0202, fax +1(650)424-0424
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Mon May 31 23:17:50 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 31 2004 - 23:18:16 CDT