Re: Polling Place conditions, reframing the issue

From: Arthur Keller <arthur_at_kellers_dot_org>
Date: Fri May 14 2004 - 13:40:10 CDT

At 10:46 AM -0700 5/14/04, Alan Dechert wrote:
>Arthur,
>>
>> I like idea of using the thumb drive *and* writing it all to the CD-R
>> at the end of the day. CD-R's are easier to load, and then the votes
>> and the program and parameters are all on one semi-permanent record.
>>
>Like a lot of things, we may wind up doing a lot of redundant things.
>Redundancy is good. Redundancy is our friend.
>
>Lou Montulli and friends at Univ of Nevada (Reno) want to use OCR instead of
>the barcode. They have a team already working on that. I say "fine." We
>can have the barcode AND OCR. The BRP may work with a scanner and check
>both the text and the barcode.

Sounds good to me.

Redundancy is good. Redundancy is our friend.
Redundancy is good. Redundancy is our friend.
Redundancy is good. Redundancy is our friend.
Redundancy is good. Redundancy is our friend.
Redundancy is good. Redundancy is our friend.

At some some degree of redundancy is good. ;-)

Best regards,
Arthur

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arthur M. Keller, Ph.D., 3881 Corina Way, Palo Alto, CA  94303-4507
tel +1(650)424-0202, fax +1(650)424-0424
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Mon May 31 23:17:42 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 31 2004 - 23:18:16 CDT