Re: Misunderstanding of PD and copyrights

From: Arthur Keller <arthur_at_kellers_dot_org>
Date: Fri May 14 2004 - 13:27:23 CDT

At 1:24 PM -0400 5/14/04, David Mertz wrote:
>What I'd like to happen for step 5 is:
>
>5. Good Guy Voting Consortium is formed, legally uses existing OVC
>reference code as a basis for creating systems that address all
>known security flaws.
>6. Recertification is easier than it would be for a de novo
>implementation, since only the diffs would need to be examined with
>maximal care.

I agree. That's an important check on the process. Nonetheless, it
may well soon become a crime to use uncertified software in an
election in California.

Best regards,
Arthur

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arthur M. Keller, Ph.D., 3881 Corina Way, Palo Alto, CA  94303-4507
tel +1(650)424-0202, fax +1(650)424-0424
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Mon May 31 23:17:42 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 31 2004 - 23:18:16 CDT