Polling Place conditions, reframing the issue

From: Edmund R. Kennedy <ekennedyx_at_yahoo_dot_com>
Date: Thu May 13 2004 - 12:16:31 CDT

Hello All:
 
I think we're taking an engineering approach to equipment security when we might want to consider more of a risk based approach, especially for the Mark I. How likely is the equipment going to be vandalized or sabotaged. Should we suggest that one or more redundant machines be on standby at a polling place? Worst case is great for structures and electrical wiring but it may not be a good approach for this sort of administrative question.
 
Thanks, Ed Kennedy

10777 Bendigo Cove
San Diego, CA 92126-2510

Amendment 1 to the US Constitution

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for the redress of grievances."
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Mon May 31 23:17:39 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 31 2004 - 23:18:16 CDT