Re: Questions-privacy folders and ballot boxes

From: Arthur Keller <arthur_at_kellers_dot_org>
Date: Thu May 13 2004 - 02:37:37 CDT

At 12:03 AM -0700 5/13/04, Steve Chessin wrote:
> >Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 09:33:29 -0700
>>From: Arthur Keller <arthur@kellers.org>
>>Subject: Re: [voting-project] Questions-privacy folders and ballot boxes
>>
>>There is unimportant minutae and important minutae. This is
>>important minutae.
>>
>>Larger ballot boxes with larger openings is a easy thing.
>>
>>I was recommending heavier stock paper with a watermark and
>>pre-printing. It's an open question whether we should have the
>>numbered tearoff like the votomatic has. The advantage is then you
>>can count your "voted" ballots, your "spoiled" ballots, and your
>>"unused" ballots, and they should match your blank ballot supply. I
>>know that some other people in the project (Alan, for example), don't
>>like to add this level of complexity.
>
>The punch cards I'm used to had a tear-off stub (that the voter kept)
>that had a serial number on it. You could have pre-scored stub on the
>heavier stock paper that had a serial number on it, that the voter tore
>off and kept. The serial numbering would make it easier to keep track
>of how many blank ballots you had at the beginning and end of the day,
>thus making it easier to determine how many voted and spoiled ballots
>you should have.

Yes, that's the idea.

Best regards,
Arthur

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arthur M. Keller, Ph.D., 3881 Corina Way, Palo Alto, CA  94303-4507
tel +1(650)424-0202, fax +1(650)424-0424
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Mon May 31 23:17:39 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 31 2004 - 23:18:16 CDT