Re: Let's not scrimp on bit space

From: Arthur Keller <arthur_at_kellers_dot_org>
Date: Fri May 07 2004 - 14:19:05 CDT

At 12:00 PM -0700 5/7/04, Alan Dechert wrote:
> > I predict that cost and usability issues suggest that we use
>> a flatbed scanner with Braille guides for the BVA.
>>
>I disagree. There is high risk and complexity by removing the ballot from
>the folder. The BVA station will most like resemble one of those
>price-checking scanners you find at some stores--you pass the barcode under
>the scanner and the price appears on a LED screen. In the BVA case, there
>will be headphones there to put on. No need for a curtain and no need to
>remove the ballot from the folder.

You need not remove the ballot from the folder to use a flatbed
scanner. How do visually impaired voters use things like the
price-check device? On the other hand, placing the ballot, in the
privacy folder, on a flatbed scanner is something that blind people
can do and so can those in wheelchairs.

>Again, trials are needed to see what works the best.

Agreed.

Best regards,
Arthur

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arthur M. Keller, Ph.D., 3881 Corina Way, Palo Alto, CA  94303-4507
tel +1(650)424-0202, fax +1(650)424-0424
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Mon May 31 23:17:23 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 31 2004 - 23:18:16 CDT