Re: Let's not scrimp on bit space

From: Edward Cherlin <edward_dot_cherlin_at_etssg_dot_com>
Date: Fri May 07 2004 - 13:22:15 CDT

On Wednesday 05 May 2004 11:15, Alan Dechert wrote:
> Karl,
>
> > There seems to be a belief that 2D bar codes are
> > significantly more expensive. I've been researching the
> > issue and that seems not to be the case.
> >
> > On the printing side there is no cost difference.
>
> Have you found GPL 2-D barcode software?

I posted several sources last year, when this issue was first
raised. It' s in the list archive.

> > On the scanning side the cost difference is not worth
> > hassling over. Once you get past the cue-cat level of
> > scanners and get into things that are robust and reliable,
> > the cost difference of scanning 1D versus 2D is small. And
> > as equipment is driven to become both 1-D and 2-D capable,
> > the price difference will become negligable.

We can use COTS sheet-fed scanners attached to COTS computers,
and GPL bar-code reader software. There is no cost issue.

> Still, I rather see hard data than anecdotes.
>
> Alan D.

-- 
Edward Cherlin, Simputer Evangelist
Encore Technologies (S) Pte. Ltd.
New voices in the global conversation
http://www.ryze.com/go/Cherlin
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Mon May 31 23:17:23 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 31 2004 - 23:18:16 CDT