Re: Fw: The Brazilian system

From: james_in_denver <james_in_denver_at_hotpop_dot_com>
Date: Wed May 05 2004 - 21:59:11 CDT

On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 22:39, Edmund R. Kennedy wrote:
> Hello Alan:
>
> That isn't spam, that's opportunity knocking!
> If, as they say at the end of the original note, "this
> technology is free of charge," why don't you take them
> up on it? It might be helpful to have a model to
> study no matter how defective it is. At the least, it
> might be fun and prehaps even for the higher good to
> send what you get down to the critics of the Brazilian
> system.
>
> Thanks, Ed Kennedy
>
> --- Alan Dechert <alan@openvotingconsortium.org>
> wrote:
> > Interesting spam I just got.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: AMBASSADOR
> > To: alan@openvotingconsortium.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 4:25 PM
> >
> >
> > Strongly suggest you contact the Brazilian Embassy

If their system is not GPL'd (or something similar), and looking at
their project resulted in some mind-set or design approach, that could
be considered as IP (Intellectual Property, not Internet Protocol)
infringement.Not a good thing right now....

James

==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Mon May 31 23:17:19 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 31 2004 - 23:18:16 CDT