RE: Bits and what they reveal

From: Popkin, Laird (WMG Corp) <"Popkin,>
Date: Wed May 05 2004 - 16:22:10 CDT

To contradict myself a bit, since there's only one reader per polling
station, and only one person running the scanner, the hardware and training
costs are less of an issue than for the vote entry stations. :-)

- LP
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-voting-project_at_afterburner_dot_sonic_dot_net
[]On Behalf Of Popkin,
Laird (WMG Corp)
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 4:33 PM
To: ''
Subject: RE: [voting-project] Bits and what they reveal

Are there problems with using multiple 1D barcodes? Unless we're looking at
requiring truly massive amounts of data, it seems to me that adding a second
1D barcode to the ballot seem to be easier/cheaper to handle than going to
2D barcodes, so perhaps two scans on a ballot might be better than requiring
somewhat more expensive and slightly harder to use scanners?
Of course, 2D barcodes are well understood in the industry, so it's not
_bad_ to use them; they just cost more and require a little more training
than dirt cheap 1D scanners.
- LP
-----Original Message-----
[]On Behalf Of David
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 2:55 PM
Subject: [voting-project] Bits and what they reveal

180 bits is right about at the limit of practical 1-D codes. So yeah,
there are a lot of of ways we might require 2-D.
Yours, David...

= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
Received on Mon May 31 23:17:17 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 31 2004 - 23:18:15 CDT