Re: Alternatives to a single bar code

From: Alan Dechert <alan_at_openvotingconsortium_dot_org>
Date: Wed May 05 2004 - 11:07:38 CDT

Edward,

> About the scanners. I like them but I would strongly
> suggest that a document feeder be required. While I
> use flat bed scanners all the time, I've often found
> them quite fussy about paper placement. Also, it
> would certainly make it easier for the disabled. The
> scanner I generally use are kind of old and seem slow.
> Are newer scanners quicker? This could be a
> usability issue.
>
Yes. It's a big usability issue. I doubt there will be scanners at the
precinct other than barcode scanners. Going behind a curtain and taking the
ballot from the folder--too many steps... too many people dropping their
ballots on the floor and such. This is also why I'm skeptical about
replacing the barcode with OCR.

Having said all that, a good full-scale funded study would set up trials and
see how it goes with different scenarios.

Alan D.
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Mon May 31 23:17:14 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 31 2004 - 23:18:15 CDT