Re: Questions from election officials

From: Douglas W. Jones <jones_at_cs_dot_uiowa_dot_edu>
Date: Mon May 03 2004 - 17:26:29 CDT

On May 3, 2004, at 2:38 PM, Alan Dechert wrote:

>> In any case, California's law mandating a hand recount of paper
>> ballots from precincts representing 1% of the voters after every
>> election is good policy! ....
>>
> I've heard bad things here. Such a sample should be randomly selected.
> From what I've heard, election officials give lip service to this. A
> guy in
> LA told me recently that precincts for manual recount are selected in
> advance and not randomly! This is a sham.

I'd suggest that half the precincts be selected at random
I'd suggest that the parties be allowed to suggest precincts
that they wish to see counted, so that a precinct in which the
first unofficial numbers depart markedly from predictions or
from some statistical model can be forced into the recount
pool.
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Mon May 31 23:17:06 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 31 2004 - 23:18:15 CDT