Re: San Francisco debate heating up

From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joehall_at_gmail_dot_com>
Date: Thu Mar 01 2007 - 20:55:43 CST

On 3/1/07, Alan Dechert <dechert@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > To be honest, I really don't want to see Sequoia's current code released
> > as
> > open source. Unlike the OVS codebase or other codebases, it was not
> > written
> > with public disclosure in mind, and has no shot of attracting a
> > development
> > community that would help fix bugs, a critical counterbalance to the claim
> > that
> > releasing code will just make it easier to hack.
> >
> There is something at work here very different from your experience with
> Apache. Importantly, it is the public's right-to-know factor. That,
> together with the regulatory barriers, makes Open Voting a lot different
> project than your average open source project. The techniques involved to
> get our points across are also necessarily different.

I must say I whole-heartedly agree with Brian on this one... you can't
just "turn on" source disclosure. It should be structured
differently. -Joe

-- 
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
PhD Student, UC Berkeley, School of Information
<http://josephhall.org/>
_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Sat Mar 31 23:17:03 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Mar 31 2007 - 23:17:09 CDT