Re: Pork barrel critiques

From: Alan Dechert <alan_at_openvotingconsortium_dot_org>
Date: Fri Mar 05 2004 - 14:31:53 CST

RE: [voting-project] Pork barrel critiquesLarid,

> IANAM (I am not a marketer) but I'd second the emphasis
> on why an open voting system is good rather than why
> proprietary voting systems are bad. Leave the negative
> message to the people who are already fighting against the
> closed systems (Bev, etc.), and present the (positive) alternative.
> All of our positives will imply a negative about the closed
> systems, or we wouldn't present them as positives, but let's
> leave them implied.
>
Sort of like the John Edwards strategy?

Alan D.
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Wed Mar 31 23:17:02 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 31 2004 - 23:17:12 CST