Re: Our Wiki just got hijacked

From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joehall_at_gmail_dot_com>
Date: Tue Jun 29 2004 - 15:30:44 CDT

I'll have to disaggree with David here and say I think 3 is best if
any authentication is implemented... with .htaccess/.htpasswd control
we will also be limiting *reading* of the wiki. With wikified access
control we can restrict editing only and leave reading alone.

Joe

On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:39:50 -0400, David Mertz
<voting-project@gnosis.cx> wrote:
>
> On Jun 29, 2004, at 3:28 PM, Popkin, Laird (WMG Corp) wrote:
> > Do we have a concensus on this? I'm happy setting up whatever we
> > want...
>
> I prefer "(1) Leave it as is" the most.
>
> My second choice would be "(2) Add HTTP authentication" This would
> deal with the spammers/vandals, and we could publish the password (say
> OVC/OVC) widely, but not in a way accessible to bots.
>
> In my mind, "(3) Access control" comes in a VERY distant third. It's
> very close to being an anti-Wiki.
>
> In any case, definitely don't setup (3) on python-hosting.com. I want
> to leave that as a real Wiki either way. If it's use is deserted,
> there's not much I can do... but at least the resource can remain
> available for open participation.
>
>

-- 
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
UC Berkeley, SIMS PhD Student
http://pobox.com/~joehall/
blog: http://pobox.com/~joehall/nqb/
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Wed Jun 30 23:17:27 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jun 30 2004 - 23:17:30 CDT