Re: OVC Architecture Decision Tree

From: Arthur Keller <arthur_at_kellers_dot_org>
Date: Mon Jun 28 2004 - 04:09:27 CDT

At 1:02 AM -0400 6/28/04, David Mertz wrote:
>On Jun 28, 2004, at 12:46 AM, james_in_denver wrote:
>>Normally, decisions/choices go in rhomboids, not that the tradiational
>>flow-charting techniques are much in vogue these days.
>
>Well, also, I decision tree should ideally have something to do with
>a sequence of dependent choices. This isn't really like that.
>
>For example, having a paper ballot is quite orthogonal to using free
>software. There are good reasons for both, but deciding one doesn't
>in any way depend on having first decided the other. Likewise with
>commodity hardware, which is unrelated to either of the "previous"
>decisions."

Yes, perhaps one decision per page, with pro/con bullet points each
on half the page.

So what do we think the decisions are?

Best regards,
Arthur

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arthur M. Keller, Ph.D., 3881 Corina Way, Palo Alto, CA  94303-4507
tel +1(650)424-0202, fax +1(650)424-0424
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Wed Jun 30 23:17:24 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jun 30 2004 - 23:17:30 CDT